Posted
Comments:
from:
www.freerepublic.com
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1435497/posts
Navigation: use the links below to
view more comments. 1-50,
51-100,
101-108
Click the post number to
see the original post at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1435497/posts
The following posted comments
are a copy of the original posts as a backup to the originals
1
posted on 07/02/2005 4:59:20 PM PDT by
Man50D
To: Man50D
perfect
2
posted on 07/02/2005 5:03:51 PM PDT
To: Man50D
Let me know when you're up and running. It's not too far
from Londonderry to Weare.... I'll bet you could have a raffle for first night
boarders.
Put me down for a couple of tickets.
3
posted on 07/02/2005 5:07:18 PM PDT
To: StoneGiant
There's no way in hell the Selectmen would approve building
a hotel in an area zone residential. The idiot that's spearheading this "idea"
should take a trip to New Hampshire to assess other posibilities such as a B &
B. The dude all show.
4
posted on 07/02/2005 5:10:11 PM PDT
To: StoneGiant
I'm not running the show. I'm just passing the word to
anyone who maybe interested. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
5
posted on 07/02/2005 5:13:37 PM PDT
To: Man50D
9. Auction off the chance to drive the bulldozer.
BWAAAHAHAHAA!!! That's great!
6
posted on 07/02/2005 5:16:06 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
Relax a bit, it's certainly worth the effort to try and in
the meantime this 'project' is pushing public awareness to new highs on the
issue of eminent domain and the erosion of our "property rights".
Chill out and let Logan run... it will be fun to see how
far this goes..
Cheers,
Lloyd
7
posted on 07/02/2005 5:16:39 PM PDT
To: Man50D
Great idea! Moveon it! Hee Hee
8
posted on 07/02/2005 5:21:22 PM PDT
To: Man50D
Add some meeting/banquet space and I'll book
conventions....how about the Association of Realtors? Maybe a faith based
convention? National Assn. of Crow Eaters? There is an "association" for
everything! Great revenue!
9
posted on 07/02/2005 5:21:52 PM PDT
To: Man50D
I wonder, if the project actually goes through, if it would
be possible to invest in it. ;)
10
posted on 07/02/2005 5:23:12 PM PDT
To: Man50D
To: Lloyd227
Why not do things in a manner that achieves the goal of
removing Souter from his homestead. Apparently his (Logan) goal is only to
promote himself and get that television show he wants.
12
posted on 07/02/2005 5:31:08 PM PDT
To: Lloyd227
Hopeitworks -hopeitworks-hopeitworks!!!!
There must be Real Estate people who would love to start
with 1 - 4. Need to hear from Clements ASAP.
I have a recipe for "ComeUppance Pudding"
13
posted on 07/02/2005 5:32:07 PM PDT
To: Alexander Rubin
I wonder, if the project actually goes through, if it would
be possible to invest in it. ;)I know I would
surely be interested as would every one I know!
14
posted on 07/02/2005 5:35:58 PM PDT
To: AnimalLover
Hmmmmmmmmmm......The Eminent Resort.....Domain
Suites......:)
15
posted on 07/02/2005 5:41:01 PM PDT
To: Smile-n-Win
Lost Liberty Hotel Ping List ping...
16
posted on 07/02/2005 5:43:19 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
What about a Theme Park?
17
posted on 07/02/2005 6:06:04 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
Then "redevelop" the rest of the neighborhood as well.
Wasting all that land on single family residences is a travesty, when there is
money to be made, and taxes collected.
Economic Redevelopment uber alles!Maybe we could
help out Africa at the same time, by hiring Robert Mugabe as a consultant.
18
posted on 07/02/2005 6:08:53 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
There's no way in hell the Selectmen would approve
building a hotel in an area zone residential.
Zoning can be changed, however it would probably be
difficult. A B&B is a good idea, but it would be hard to argue that it would
bring significantly more tax revenue to the town. Unless of course the
Selectmen are already motivated to go along with the project. Unlikely since
local governments are the biggest beneficiaries, at least for now, of this
unconstitutional "taking".
19
posted on 07/02/2005 6:32:38 PM PDT
To: Man50D
My only suggestion is to name the hotel "Lost Liberty
Lodge". It rolls off the tongue better.
I also like the idea of the guest bulldozer. I could see putting up some
things on e-Bay to get some real bidding going. Maybe like when the president
signs a bill with 50 different pens, you could sell 50 different swipes at the
Judge's house.
20
posted on 07/02/2005 6:33:19 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
"Why not do things in a manner that achieves the goal of
removing Souter from his homestead. Apparently his (Logan) goal is only to
promote himself and get that television show he wants."
What is your major malfunction? Television show?
Please source your claims. If you have any sources.
21
posted on 07/02/2005 6:42:01 PM PDT
To: Lloyd227
I agree. Not only is the public aware - but city officials
are commiting political suicide if they approve such stuff .. at least I would
hope people would be outraged and vote such people out of office.
And .. I hope the House continues on it's path to DEFUND such actions. Pelosi
says we can't do that .. but WE NOT ONLY CAN - WE SHOULD.
22
posted on 07/02/2005 6:42:30 PM PDT
To: Man50D
If Lettuce Alone isn't on the menu, well that's just wrong.
23
posted on 07/02/2005 6:48:48 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
There is nothing to stop someone else from filing another
plan on for Mr. Souter's property. That's the beautiful thing about this plan.
Mr. Souter can now spend the rest of his days (or until Kelo vs New Longon is
overturned) defending every piece of property he owns. If this plan of Mr.
Logan's doesn't pass muster, the next plan might, or the one after that. And
if Mr. Souter decides to move to the family property in Massachusetts, someone
in our midst can simply file the appropriate plans to claim that land and
build something more suitable to the economic development of that community as
well.So, if this plan of Logan's is not as well
thought out as it should be, then please feel free to file another plan of
your own.
The more the merrier until these elite bastards learn
that they live under the same laws we do.
Cheers
Lloyd
24
posted on 07/02/2005 6:59:24 PM PDT
To: yooper
You obviously didn't see his interview on Fox. He stated he
was trying to create a TV talk show.
25
posted on 07/02/2005 7:09:22 PM PDT
To: yooper
Please source your claims. If you have any sources.
Go to Freestar's
homepage. You will be able to read about the proposed television show on the
main page.
26
posted on 07/02/2005 7:14:22 PM PDT
To: Alexander Rubin
I emailed my suggestion to Mr. Clements. He should allow
small investors and give a free nights stay with each share purchased in the
hotel. He could raise millions by doing this.
27
posted on 07/02/2005 7:57:34 PM PDT
To: Graymatter
"If Lettuce Alone isn't on the menu, well that's
just wrong."
Other menu items should include:
On the lightweight side:
- Liberal Loser Lobster
- Slimy Souter Surprise Salad
- Kraut Kennedy Kabobs
- Grimy Ginsburg Goulash
- Seditious Stephens Sandwich
- Bilious Breyer Bologna
- Occasionally O’Connor Oxtail Soup
For heavy hitters only:
- Cool Conservative Catfish
- Reliable Rehnquist Roast
- Stalwart Scalia Spaghetti
- Trustworthy Thomas Tenderloin
28
posted on 07/02/2005 9:00:08 PM PDT
To: RebelTex
bttt
29
posted on 07/02/2005 9:04:32 PM PDT
Comment #30 Removed by Moderator
To: upchuck
Have you seen this one yet?
31
posted on 07/02/2005 10:45:32 PM PDT
To: Man50D
"Chicken Seizure Salad" - yum.
F you, Souter, you little turd.
32
posted on 07/02/2005 10:48:19 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
There's no way in hell the Selectmen would approve
building a hotel in an area zone residential.
Tell that to Mr. Kelo.
33
posted on 07/02/2005 10:50:36 PM PDT
To: Man50D
bookmark
34
posted on 07/03/2005 4:59:46 AM PDT
To: politicalwit
Think about it another way. When the project gets
disapproved by the local government, the developer can potentially sue
claiming he was denied his rights under the recent Kelo decision. Let that one
get to the USSC and we will see some fast revision of justice.
And I liked Steyn's column on the subject using the idea
that Federal lands are underutilizing their potential tax revenue and should
thus be taken. It could get really interesting.
35
posted on 07/03/2005 5:24:07 AM PDT
To: Justanobody
Thx for the ping. Yeppers, I did.
36
posted on 07/03/2005 5:32:28 AM PDT
To: Man50D
LOL, how about shredded constitution hashbrowns for the
menu?
37
posted on 07/03/2005 5:33:58 AM PDT
To: Man50D
Has the escrow fund been established and where can we send
a check?
38
posted on 07/03/2005 6:05:35 AM PDT
To: Desdemona
I found the following information on the Freestar Media
website. Someone there maybe able to answer your questions.
Contact us
Freestar Media, LLC
7657 Winnetka Avenue, #707
Canoga Park, CA 91306
We are overwhelmed with calls and e-mails from well-wishers (over 5,000
e-mails and over 400 phone calls). Thank you, but please help us keep our
lines and e-mail boxes open so that potential financial supporters and media
outlets can get through. Thank you for understanding.
If you would like to support us financially so we can hire more staff click
here.
Phone 310-593-4843
logan@freestarmedia.com
39
posted on 07/03/2005 6:10:18 AM PDT by
Man50D
To: Thebaddog
" Federal lands are underutilizing their potential tax
revenue and should thus be taken."
That was my thinking...nothing like taking the Supreme Court building to build
a strip mall to generate some tax revenue. Afterall, the Supremes aren't
generating any tax revenue and it has that "Godly" message called the 10
Commandants (illegal I might add) craved in it.
40
posted on 07/03/2005 6:32:08 AM PDT
To: politicalwit
You will have to take up the Ten Commandments with Steven
Breyer. He's the worm that takes both sides of every position after checking
with the international community.
41
posted on 07/03/2005 6:51:57 AM PDT
To: ReformedTreeHugger
Add some meeting/banquet space and I'll book
conventions....how about the Association of Realtors? Maybe a faith based
convention? National Assn. of Crow Eaters? There is an "association" for
everything! Great revenue!The Ten
Commandments must be posted in a prominent place at the hotel...perhaps also
in every room?
42
posted on 07/03/2005 10:30:58 AM PDT
To: Man50D
9. Auction off the chance to drive the
bulldozer.Well, they need a professional present
to supervise. I nominate the guy who squashed Rachel Corrie. (He could come in
handy in the event, however unlikely, that Souter tries to defend "his"
property.)
43
posted on 07/03/2005 11:24:48 AM PDT
Comment #44 Removed by Moderator
To: Lloyd227
"There is nothing to stop someone else from filing another
plan on for Mr. Souter's property."
You are sooo right! ! In fact, there should be competition for that land,
because every project will require a response as long as the filing fee is
paid. Bed and Breakfast, Gas Station, 7-11 - They'd all make more tax revenue.
How about a topless joint? That would be a pip. This could become the most
expensive little piece of land around!
45
posted on 07/03/2005 12:32:07 PM PDT
To: FastCoyote
Can I ask the moderator why my comment #45 was pulled? Was
it because I offended politicalwit by namecalling? If so, I apologize, it was
in response to his calling freestar an idiot.
If it was because I inappropriately addressed the bribery issue regarding the
Souter property, can you give me some guidelines?
46
posted on 07/03/2005 12:36:21 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
Well, I do have to say that Logan has done far more for
"consciousness raising" on property rights and the Foul Five's most recent
treason than I noticed in your posts.
Might I ask why the ad hominum attack on him?
47
posted on 07/03/2005 2:09:03 PM PDT
To: CyberAnt
New Hampshire could pass a constitutional amendment
forbidding such takings. Hopefully, they will pass it shortly after Souter's
house is bulldozed.
48
posted on 07/03/2005 2:11:35 PM PDT
To: GladesGuru
"Might I ask why the ad hominum attack on him?"
Sorry if you see this as an attack on him. After listening to him on Fox it
just appears his motives are more self-serving than for the good of the
nation. I see him in the same vain as John Walsh on "America's Most Wanted."
49
posted on 07/03/2005 2:24:29 PM PDT
To: politicalwit
You're obviously entitled to your opinion and I know this
is tangental to the original post but I can't help wonder how many criminals
would still be at large if it wasn't for John Walsh? If not John Walsh then
who?
50
posted on 07/03/2005 2:32:36 PM PDT
Navigation: use the links below to
view more comments. 1-50,
51-100,
101-108
Click the post number to
see the original post at
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1435497/posts
The following posted comments
are a copy of the original posts as a backup to the originals
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free
Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent
the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are
protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.